• Star Trek

    From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Boraxman on Thu May 8 09:01:48 2025
    Re: Re: Most memorable modern
    By: Boraxman to DaiTengu on Thu May 08 2025 09:27 pm

    Depict whatever you like in fiction, but be clear of the difference
    between what works in fiction and what works in reality. Anyone can
    make their ideals work in fiction and convince people that real life
    would work according to their rules.

    I think everyone understands that work a fiction is not reality. It's pretty clear and understood what works in fiction, as it doesn't necessarily represent reality.

    I've enjoyed watching Star Trek as it represents what we could be, but I feel like it's also good entertainment.

    If you've only watched the original series, maybe give some of the other Star Trek series a try (maybe Deep Space 9) but it sounds like it might not be your thing.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Boraxman@VERT/MSRDBBS to Nightfox on Fri May 9 08:12:00 2025
    Nightfox wrote to Boraxman <=-

    @MSGID: <681CD56C.74551.dove_dove-gen@digitaldistortionbbs.com>
    @REPLY: <681C9584.65071.dove-gen@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
    Re: Re: Most memorable modern
    By: Boraxman to DaiTengu on
    Thu May 08 2025 09:27 pm

    Depict whatever you like in fiction, but be clear of the
    difference
    between what works in fiction and what works in reality. Anyone can
    make their ideals work in fiction and convince people that real life
    would work according to their rules.

    I think everyone understands that work a fiction is not reality. It's pretty clear and understood what works in fiction, as it doesn't necessarily represent reality.

    I've enjoyed watching Star Trek as it represents what we could be, but
    I feel like it's also good entertainment.

    If you've only watched the original series, maybe give some of the
    other Star Trek series a try (maybe Deep Space 9) but it sounds like it might not be your thing.

    I don't think everyone does understand the difference between reality and idealism. If people by and large did, we wouldn't have such an absurd amount of
    propaganda and messaging and absolute relentless portrayals of the "ideal future". Almost every single ad on TV is now "Star Trek". You'll barely see a family on a TV advert that isn't mixed race. Its a completely manufactured image to try and sell a future. Almost all corporate messaging is
    deliberately tuned to present this ideal. It sounds innocent, but people actually do honestly base their politics on works of fiction. Another example is Ayn Rand, there are people who honestly make political decisions, based on her fiction. They think the world works the way it does in Atlas Shrugged.

    Note, this is different to a work with a moral in it (like Aesops fables), or a warning (Crime and Punishment).

    I think the first Star Trek series I watched was The Next Generation, in the early 90s. I didn't actually know there had been an earlier series. I thought
    at the time that "Star Trek" prior to that was just the movies. I stumbled onto
    the original series later, and it was different. Star Trek the original series was more of a space adventure, with heroism and exploration. The Next Generation had that element, but also was more "beaurocratic". I watched an episode of Voyager or two, but it seemed the franchise had become more about the
    Star Trek Universe than adventure itself. At least that is my impression, others will see things differently. Deep Space 9 didn't interest me at all.




    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
    þ Synchronet þ MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org
  • From Cougar428@VERT/CJSPLACE to BORAXMAN on Fri May 9 09:23:16 2025
    Quoting Boraxman to Nightfox <=-

    I've enjoyed watching Star Trek as it represents what we could be, but
    I feel like it's also good entertainment.

    I don't think everyone does understand the difference between reality
    and idealism. If people by and large did, we wouldn't have such an
    absurd amount of
    propaganda and messaging and absolute relentless portrayals of the
    "ideal future". Almost every single ad on TV is now "Star Trek".
    You'll barely see a family on a TV advert that isn't mixed race. Its a completely manufactured image to try and sell a future. Almost all corporate messaging is deliberately tuned to present this ideal. It sounds innocent, but people actually do honestly base their politics on works of fiction.

    I agree with your points on TV ads and corporate messaging. Not sure what
    that has to do with Star Trek or entertainment in general (other than
    the corporations supporting it). The content is entertainment. And the
    content you watch is voluntary. If I don't like something I don't watch
    it. Doubly so for the ad industry supporting it.

    It's sickening to see a great older movie, supported by pharma
    companies who invent drugs to solve imaginary illnesses and directed at
    normal people who don't have any of those imaginary problems. I don't
    like it, so I don't normally watch that content. Thats voluntary for me
    though.

    Star trek is fun for me to watch. It's a getaway. Reminds me of the
    1960's when things were simpler (for me anyway).

    ... Pardon me, but would you have any Blue Poupon?

    ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CJ's Place, Orange City, FL - cjsplace.thruhere.net
  • From Jimmy Anderson@VERT/PALANTIR to Boraxman on Fri May 9 10:22:42 2025
    Boraxman wrote to Nightfox <=-

    I think the first Star Trek series I watched was The Next Generation,
    in the early 90s. I didn't actually know there had been an earlier series. I thought
    at the time that "Star Trek" prior to that was just the movies. I stumbled onto
    the original series later, and it was different. Star Trek the
    original series was more of a space adventure, with heroism and exploration. The Next Generation had that element, but also was more "beaurocratic".

    I think this is a very astute comment! TOS was more adventure television,
    set in space (the final frontier), much like Quantum Leap was a drama
    set in the world of time travel. Why time travel? Because the creator
    wanted to make an anthology program. Time travel became the best way
    to get the protaganist into a different 'setting' each week.

    Even The Walking Dead, back when it was new, was the same for me. Once
    I started watching it I realized it was a drama set during a zombie
    apocalypse. The stories and character development would have worked
    even if the setting had been different.



    ... Deja Tue: A feeling that yesterday was Monday ...
    --- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL